Where Shall We Go?

Product Information

a. Refuse the participation of any person in the Contest and/or disqualify any participant of the Contest for any reason whatsoever, including but not limited to unsafe or unruly behavior that may result in harm or damage to that person or any other persons; and We will begin by focusing on 'What information do we need?' from the policy makers’ perspective by holding a small expert roundtable. I will then be presenting the ideas and findings from that discussion during an open discussion forum where I will look forward to hearing your responses and questions. e. Any other person or class of persons deemed ineligible or notified by CAG as being ineligible from time to time. So the eternal Word of God took on human flesh, and in that way the divine Son of God — who never had an origin and never came into being and was God, but was also with God — became man. And in doing this, he made the glory of God visible in a wholly new way. And this divine glory, uniquely manifest in the Son of God, was full of grace and truth. And from that fullness we receive grace upon grace.

Understandably, several participants raised questions regarding where that journey began and where it was heading. Some saw educational equity as the starting point on a journey towards social equity, while others turned this around and pointed out that a degree of social equity - in relation to family housing, health and reducing poverty - was needed if educational equity was to take root. If Peter were alive today, here’s the way his process of thought might have gone. Lord, where shall we go? To Those Who Deny God’s Sovereignty? And for many of us, what keeps us from going to any of these is the same thing that kept Peter. Verse 68: “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life.” In other words, we may not have all the problems solved — the problems of following Jesus and saying yes to his teaching and his Lordship and his saving work. He may confuse us at times, and baffle us with things he says, and provoke us, and offend us. To the fullest extent permitted by law, CAG shall not be liable in contract, tort (including negligence) or otherwise, for any direct loss, indirect or consequential loss, damage, cost and expense, or loss or profits, arising out of or in connection with the Contest, save and except for any personal injury or death caused by the negligence of CAG and its employees. Below, you can learn more about when and why we use should and shall. How to Use the Modal Verb ShallAll Prize(s) are only valid for redemption for a period of one (1) month from the date of award (both dates inclusive), after which the Prize shall be deemed forfeited, and there shall be strictly no extensions. CAG will not entertain any appeals whatsoever. When it comes to shall vs should, both are used to express questions and obligations. What’s more, should is the past form of shall. However, they both are used in different contexts and have different undertones. Simon Peter, therefore, answered him, 'Sir, unto whom shall we go? thou hast sayings of life age-during; Finally there is the possibility of the negative question. Negative questions carry a strong implication (compare the neutral "can you play tennis" with the marked "can't you play tennis" - the latter means that the speaker would be surprised that you can't) But this implication doesn't work well with "Shall we" type suggestions. Jesus said to the Twelve, “Do you want to go away as well?” Simon Peter answered him, “Lord, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life, 69 and we have believed, and have come to know, that you are the Holy One of God.” (John 6:67–69) Jesus Offers Life Right Now

For instance, shall is more formal than should. It’s also used in both business English and legal English. If you are learning English for either of these reasons, using the right modal verb can make you sound more professional. For example, after saying in John 1:1 that the eternal Word “was God,” he writes in John 1:14–16, “And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth . . . And from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace.” Grace: The Dominant Note of Christmas All Prize Winner(s) shall provide proof of identity, age and residency and such other documents as CAG may reasonably require. In the event that the Prize Winner(s) is unable to provide, he or she shall be deemed to have forfeited the Prize. Participants agree that they will indemnify and hold harmless CAG, and its directors, officers, employees, agents, contractors (each an “Indemnified Party”) from and against all claims, demands, chose in action, judgments, suits, proceedings, liabilities, costs, expenses, damages and losses (including but not limited to any direct, indirect or consequential losses, loss of profit, loss of reputation and all interest, penalties, legal costs (calculated on a full indemnity basis and including solicitor and client costs) and all other professional costs and expenses) suffered or incurred by an Indemnified Party arising out of or in connection with their participation in the Contest.Notwithstanding that a Participant may be eligible to enter both the General Draw and the Trust Card Draw, no Participant shall be eligible to win in more than one draw and/or more than one Prize. c. Any person who is or becomes insane, deceased, insolvent or is the subject of a criminal investigation, or has criminal proceedings instituted against him/her in any jurisdiction (at the time of entry and/or the draw);

In the event of any inconsistency between these Terms & Conditions and any other form of publicity collaterals relating to a Contest, these Terms & Conditions shall prevail. In this article you can learn the difference between shall vs should, why it’s important, and how to use them properly. We’ve also provided you with examples of when to use each. So, without further ado, shall we begin? What is the difference between shall vs should?

Looking for something different

CAG reserves the right (in its sole and absolute discretion) to determine the eligibility of any person in relation to the Contest, and CAG may at any time during the Contest disqualify any person from participating in the Contest without providing any reason if it determines that such person does not meet the eligibility criteria above. In October, Cambridge Assessment Network held an event with over 150 educators from around the world, coming together to discuss the topic of equity in education. The session was led by Loic Menzies, former teacher and former Chief Executive of The Centre for Education and Youth, researcher, and policy specialist with twenty years' experience in the education and youth sector. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, so that he could give his flesh for the life of the world.”